Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
freiburg.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Ein Mastodon-Server für Freiburg und Umland betrieben durch den Verein freiburg.social e.V.: https://wir.freiburg.social

Administered by:

Server stats:

532
active users

freiburg.social: AboutProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.4

#glenpeters

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
anlomedad<p>Y'all know how countries use creative accounting when reporting greenhouse gases to UNFCCC? <br>Especially their natural carbon sinks are overestimated regarding CO2. <br>I once checked Canada and Russia regarding their reporting of CO2 in sinks vs the steep increase in recent years of forest and peat fires. The reporting does not reflect this at all. </p><p>But enough of that outrage. <br>Here's a brand new reality check on methane emissions as reported to UNFCCC versus scientific analysis<br>"Comparison of observation- and inventory-based methane emissions for eight large global emitters" , <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Petrescu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Petrescu</span></a>, <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/GlenPeters" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GlenPeters</span></a> et al 2024<br><a href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/16/4325/2024/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">essd.copernicus.org/articles/1</span><span class="invisible">6/4325/2024/</span></a></p><p>It shows how the comparison of scientific analysis versus reporting by the EU is quite congruent! Commendable and surprising. <br>While all others write fantasy novels in their reporting. </p><p>Very happy that we have these reality checks by scientists ❤️ </p><p><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/methane" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>methane</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/CH4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CH4</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/UNFCCC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>UNFCCC</span></a></p>
anlomedad<p>In the 16th century, population in the Americas dropped from 65 to 9mio which drew ~7ppm from the atmosphere into trees🌳 This is called the "1610 event". Also related: AMOC stuttered bigly around 1610 with a drop of 1.4.👀<br>Unlike the populations in other world regions, the Americans hadn't known the plough so had to fell new trees all the time to keep nutrition stable. </p><p>In the 20th century, WW2 killed 80mio. Their land use for cooking and heating with wood ended abruptly. And atmospheric growth in CO2 dropped to 0, despite growing fossil fuel emissions. And AMOC weakened by 0.7! A "1610-event" in the 20th century.</p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mas.to/@Peters_Glen" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>Peters_Glen</span></a></span> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/GlenPeters" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GlenPeters</span></a> ' thread on Twix prompted me to compare my old chart for the depopulation in the Americas and effect on <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/CO2" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CO2</span></a> and <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/AMOC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMOC</span></a> with last century. <br><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/RCPcollapse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RCPcollapse</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/FridaysForFuture" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FridaysForFuture</span></a></p>
anlomedad<p>One of my favorite accounts is <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/GlenPeters" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GlenPeters</span></a>, unfortunately not active in the Fediverse. In this thread, he takes down the newest <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/IEA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>IEA</span></a> report . Finally! The attitude to the delayer machine that IEA de facto is, was by far too apologetic and IEA is still referenced by far too many as reliable source for anything wrt <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/climate" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>climate</span></a> and <a href="https://mst.mineown.de/tags/ClimatePolicy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ClimatePolicy</span></a> </p><p>I'll copy the URL to the individual tweets into ALT text so you can open them if you like.</p>
ExploreLive feeds
About